Citizen Portal
Sign In

West Chester Area SD receives PFM briefing on roughly $33 million bond plan, schedules March parameters vote

West Chester Area School District (Property Finance Committee; Teaching, Learning & Equity Committee) · February 17, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A municipal advisory presentation outlined a potential roughly $33 million bond issue to finish capital projects, explained how timing uses debt drop-offs to limit near-term debt service, and proposed a parameters-resolution timeline with board consideration in March.

Garrett Moore, municipal advisor with PFM, told the West Chester Area School District property finance committee on Feb. 17 that the district may need about $33 million in new borrowing to complete current construction phases, a districtwide automation system and several school projects.

Moore presented interest-rate history, the district's existing debt-service schedule and call dates and said the financing plan uses a near-term drop in existing debt service to keep early-year payments low. He described a parameters resolution as a nonbinding authorization that sets the borrowing boundaries and allows the financing team to enter the market when conditions are favorable.

The presentation showed existing debt, estimated debt service for the proposed 2026 bonds and a sample timeline: a status update to the committee on March 16, a parameters-resolution vote by the full board on March 23, tentative pricing in late March and settlement around April 30 if market conditions permit. Moore emphasized that the parameters resolution does not obligate sale; it merely provides flexibility for timely execution.

District finance staff framed the borrowing goal in the context of Policy 623, which the presenters said establishes a 10% guideline for annual debt-service obligations and requires an action plan if that threshold is exceeded. Mr. Scully, who reviewed the district's forecast model earlier in the meeting, told the committee the district currently faces a roughly $2.9 million gap the administration must address in next year's budget.

No parameters resolution was approved at the Feb. 17 meeting; staff and the municipal advisor said they would return with a parameters resolution and bid results for committee and board review in March. The committee did not commit to any sale or pricing at the Feb. 17 session.