Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Detention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances $20 million bill to reimburse local governments for short‑term detention holds amid public outcry
Summary
The Senate Appropriations committee voted to advance SB 11‑56, a $20 million FY2027 appropriation to reimburse cities, towns and counties for short‑term detention holds for unauthorized noncitizens; public testimony featured sharp opposition calling the funding 'warehousing' and 'concentration camps.'
The Senate Committee on Appropriations, Transportation and Technology on Feb. 12 voted to give Senate Bill 11‑56 a due‑pass recommendation, advancing a proposal to appropriate $20,000,000 in fiscal year 2027 from the State General Fund to the Department of Public Safety to reimburse cities, towns and counties for costs associated with short‑term detention holds for unauthorized noncitizens.
Sponsor Senator Wendy Rogers said the bill is a reimbursement measure for localities that have borne the housing costs for detainees and described it as a backfill for municipalities that were left with financial burdens. “It is appropriating $20,000,000,” she said during the hearing, adding the money would repay jurisdictions for expenses already incurred.
Public testimony at the committee was sharply critical. Elijah Florence, who identified himself as representing himself, told senators: “This bill would appropriate 20,000,000 to reimburse local governments for caging people and ICE detention. In plain terms, it creates concentration camps in our cities.” Other speakers warned the measure would expand detention capacity in Arizona and urged lawmakers to instead invest in housing, health care and services for families.
Committee members questioned how funds would be allocated and whether municipalities entered into agreements with federal authorities before incurring costs. Senator Leach asked whether cities and towns “signed agreements with the federal government” and whether costs were counted upfront; Senator Rogers said her understanding is many local jurisdictions bore the expense and that this bill is intended to repay those costs.
The committee moved the bill and, after roll call, recorded a due‑pass recommendation (5 ayes, 3 noes, 2 not voting). Several members said they expect further floor discussion and that the sponsor had pledged to look for alternative funding sources or local cost‑sharing.
What’s next: With the committee recommendation, SB 11‑56 moves to the Senate floor for additional debate and possible amendment. The sponsor has indicated willingness to explore cost‑sharing with affected local governments.
