Citizen Portal
Sign In

Higher-education budget advances after heated DEI/CRT proviso debate; motion to remove proviso fails

Committee on Appropriations · February 12, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Committee on Appropriations approved the Kansas Board of Regents budgets for FY2026–2027 after hours of debate over DEI/CRT-related proviso language; a motion to delete the proviso failed and the budget package moved forward with the language intact.

The Committee on Appropriations moved and passed the Kansas Board of Regents budget recommendations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 after a lengthy debate focused on proviso language addressing diversity, equity, inclusion and related curricular matters.

Chairman Turk presented the KBOR packet, noting FY2026 revised estimates and a larger FY2027 agency request driven by student-success initiatives, statutory transfers and one-time requests. Committee adjustments included restoration of scholarship reappropriations, funding for Blueprint for Literacy and allocations to community and technical colleges. Chairman Turk also noted language prohibiting an administrative surcharge on transfers to universities and other reporting requirements.

DEI/CRT proviso debate: Members spent substantial time arguing over new or renewed language intended to constrain DEI/CRT materials and curricular requirements. Chairman Turk described DEI as “a distraction in higher education,” saying the institutions should be focused on producing the workforce. Representative Boyle and others countered that the proviso threatens academic freedom and free speech and noted course syllabi are often faculty intellectual property. Representative Hoye moved to remove the proviso; the motion was seconded by Representative Ballard but failed when the noes prevailed on the voice vote.

Why it matters: The provision affects how universities document or assert that curricula or student requirements do not include DEI/CRT content; critics said the language is novel and could chill instruction and academic inquiry, while supporters said it clarifies legislative intent to avoid compelled coursework unrelated to a student’s major.

Motions and outcome: After the DEI/CRT motion failed, Chairman Turk moved the Kansas Board of Regents budgets for 2026 and 2027; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. Committee members requested additional reporting on reappropriations, tuition-related limits and a restructuring report from universities on administrative spending.

Context and next steps: The committee added targeted one-time and ongoing allocations for two-year colleges, defined distribution language for community and technical college capital outlay and continued Blueprint for Literacy funding. The Board of Regents package will proceed with the committee’s provisos and reporting requirements.