Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Print Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee forwards $1.1 million print-management platform contract with ASMGI to full council
Summary
The Public Works Procurement Contracting Committee forwarded Resolution R20250126 to the full council, recommending a contract with Advanced Server Management Group Inc. (ASMGI) for up to $1.1 million to host the countys print-management software platform; committee members confirmed the vendor is the incumbent and that the platform does not perform physical printing.
The Public Works Procurement Contracting Committee on April 2 forwarded to the full council a recommended contract with Advanced Server Management Group Incorporated (ASMGI) to provide the countys print-management software platform, authorizing an amount not to exceed $1,100,000.
Tom Pavich, Public Works, told the committee the procurement was competitive and that the request had been released twice; ASMGI was the only proposer the second time but scored well and is the incumbent partner since 2019. "This first item, we're looking to have a contract approved with ASMGI," Pavich said, describing ASMGI as the software host that manages vendor registration, bidding and awards for print jobs while the county agencies still set specifications for individual jobs.
The resolution recorded on the agenda as R20250126 (requisition 15371) covers the software platform and related services, not the physical production of printed materials. Pavich said the vendors role is to host the platform and handle the competitive process; the county continues to set job specifications and awards, and vendors perform the actual printing.
Committee members asked clarifying questions about the vendors scope and whether the vendor performs printing. Pavich reiterated that ASMGI is a "software host" and does not perform the print work itself. The committee voted to send the item to the full council under second-reading suspension; the committee chair announced the motion was adopted by voice vote.
The committee did not record detailed vote tallies in the provided transcript. The full council will receive the resolution for final consideration and any additional procedural steps or public records associated with council review will determine the contracts effective date and implementation schedule.
