Federal Way council faces public backlash after contentious special meeting; flags, ICE and conduct dominate public comment
Loading...
Summary
Residents packed the Feb. 17 council meeting to press the city about a contentious special meeting, flag policy, ICE presence and council conduct. Speakers split between defending actions taken and urging civility; several asked for transparency, mediation and a retreat.
Federal Way’s city council spent much of its regular meeting on Feb. 17 responding to an overflow public-comment period sparked by a heated special meeting the prior week. Dozens of residents pressed the council on conduct, a proposed flag policy, student walkouts related to immigration enforcement and whether council leaders had followed appropriate procedures.
Several speakers criticized the special meeting and its handling. Graham Evans said the session provided “zero” benefit to the city unless follow-up occurs, and urged the council to rebuild collaboration. Paul McDaniel said the meeting followed the “letter” of the law but violated the “spirit,” describing the optics as “dirty.” Multiple speakers asked for a transparent explanation about how the special meeting was called and whether state open‑meetings rules were observed.
Other public comments focused on flags and representation. Susan Andrew Salmon and others urged the council to consider which groups are represented by flag displays, saying a government‑only approach can feel exclusionary. Jeffrey Tangredi asked the council to consider representation for the 28 federally recognized tribes in Washington state and their flags.
Immigration enforcement also drew repeated comment. Adrian Davio, speaking for himself and citing a range of claims about state and local policy, asked whether liability insurers would cover harms he attributed to sanctuary policies and urged the council to stop promoting certain policies in schools and government. Several speakers called for a town hall and broader community conversation about ICE and student fears; Lana Bostick asked the council to consult neighboring mayors and provide concrete next steps at the upcoming state‑of‑the‑city event.
A number of residents said the episode highlighted governance and civility problems at City Hall. Multiple commenters urged the council to pursue a facilitated retreat or mediation; Council President Honda subsequently said she has already contacted the Sound Cities Association to find a facilitator and suggested an April retreat to rebuild professional working relationships.
The council did not take a formal policy vote on the flag question or ICE at this meeting. Council members repeatedly separated discussion of federal policy from local authority while also saying they would listen to youth and community concerns. Mayor Farrell (as addressed by speakers at the meeting) and council members said a community town‑hall will be scheduled so residents can raise broader issues and hear director briefings.
