Bill would raise counties' construction bid threshold from $25,000 to $100,000; Sedgwick County official backs change
Loading...
Summary
Senate Bill 436 would increase the dollar threshold at which counties must use a public bidding process for construction from $25,000 to $100,000; proponents cited inflation and multi-month delays tied to formal bids, while some senators worried about reduced access for small subcontractors and the lack of written opponents in the live record.
Senate Bill 436 would amend existing county procurement law to raise the construction public-bid threshold from $25,000 to $100,000, mirroring what staff said is the state's current threshold for no-bid contracting. The change would apply to county construction spending on buildings, roads and bridges, with exceptions for certain bridge work tied to disaster statutes and for emergency repairs to county buildings made under public-health or public-safety declarations.
Jason, committee staff, told the Senate Committee on Transparency and Ethics that the bill increases the cost threshold and that exceptions already exist in current law, for example for professional services and road projects governed by a separate transportation statute. "This would simply increase the threshold of the cost from 25,000 to 100,000," he said.
Tanya Cole, assistant county manager for Sedgwick County, testified by WebEx in support and described the operational burden of preparing formal bid documents. Cole told the committee that preparing plans and specifications, a public advertising period, vetting low bids and obtaining county-commission approval can extend project timelines by "approximately 4 to 5 months," slowing repairs and maintenance across the county's inventory of buildings. She also cited construction-cost inflation in recent years as a reason to update the statutory threshold.
Committee members noted countervailing concerns. Senators asked whether raising the threshold could reduce opportunities for subcontractors and small vendors who rely on competitive bidding. Cole said counties frequently maintain "on-call" lists of vetted contractors for recurring needs and that executed contracts and project dollar amounts would remain public business subject to open-meetings and open-records rules.
The clerk noted two written-only opponents (Lawrence Leclair and Michael Oscar) and a written proponent from Jay Hall with the Kansas Association of Counties; no opponents spoke at the live hearing. The committee closed the hearing on SB 436; no committee vote on the bill was recorded at this meeting.
Separately, the committee approved its January 27 minutes on a motion by Sen. Clifford with a second from Sen. Bowser; the motion passed by voice vote.
