Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mortgage Law topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee Hears Staff Briefing on SB 5831 to Codify Uniform Mortgage Modification Act

Senate Consumer Protection and Business Committee · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Consumer Protection and Business Committee received a staff briefing and sponsor remarks on SB 5831, which would enact the Uniform Mortgage Modification Act in Washington and create safe harbors that preserve mortgage priority after certain modifications; no public testimony was offered.

The Senate Consumer Protection and Business Committee heard a staff briefing Feb. 18 on Senate Bill 5831, which would enact the Uniform Mortgage Modification Act in Washington.

Peter Klotfelter, committee staff, told the panel that the measure would make clear that for a set of mortgage changes identified in the bill — such as limited extensions of maturity, reductions in interest rate, forgiveness of principal or interest, and certain escrow or insurance-account adjustments — “the mortgage retains its priority regardless of whether a record of the mortgage modification is recorded,” and is not a novation that substitutes the original contract.

The bill adopts a safe-harbor approach similar to the model law promulgated by the Uniform Law Commission in 2024. Under the proposal, modifications that fall within the listed categories would continue to secure the obligation and would not lose priority to junior interests. Klotfelter said modifications not identified in the bill would be governed by other law. He also noted explicit exceptions, including releases or additions to encumbered property, changes in obligors, assignments and transfers of mortgages.

Senator Perry Dozier, the bill’s prime sponsor, told the committee the measure is intended to reduce uncertainty and the need for homeowners to seek legal advice about whether a modification must be re-recorded. “It just kind of gives some clarification and a little bit more certainty,” Dozier said.

No members of the public signed in to testify on SB 5831; the committee closed the public hearing and moved on to other agenda items.