Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Funding Standard topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs 'gold standard' framework to certify community organizations
Summary
The committee reviewed LC031, a proposed framework to set criteria for community organizations that could be eligible for future funding; DJJ warned it lacks current capacity and suggested RFP-based alternatives to reach small nonprofits while ensuring accountability.
Committee members discussed LC031, described in the packet as a 'gold standard' framework that would establish criteria community organizations could use to demonstrate capacity and accountability should future funding be allocated.
Proponents said a common certification would help agencies and legislators vet organizations and give confidence that funds are used effectively. "I think it's a great idea to standardize," one member told the panel, arguing the framework would help groups on the front line.
Director Hendrick and other DJJ representatives cautioned the committee that DJJ currently lacks the staff and funding to administer a certification process and suggested alternatives such as expanding existing RFPs or using a contractor to certify organizations. DJJ noted it already partners with dozens of small after-school sites and manages a $5,000,000 evidence-based-contract up for rebid next year that could be adapted to include community-based services.
Members discussed trade-offs: a certification process might reach small nonprofits but could be administratively burdensome; an RFP or expanded contract might favor larger providers but could include requirements to partner with smaller community organizations. The committee asked DJJ to provide edits and examples from its contracting language and to return feedback before the committee decides whether to introduce the framework as drafted.
