Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HB296 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prosecutors' association opposes bill delaying fines and fees for people released from prison
Summary
The Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association opposed House Bill 296 before the Judiciary Committee, saying the bill would weaken accountability by delaying fines, fees and financial sanctions 180 days after release or transitional control and would apply a blanket policy rather than individualized judicial discretion.
Get email alerts on the HB296 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A representative of the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association testified in opposition to House Bill 296, which would delay financial sanctions associated with felony convictions for 180 days after release from prison or completion of transitional control.
Mr. Tobin told the committee the association opposes the bill because it would weaken accountability, treat all returning individuals the same regardless of means or criminal history, and duplicate judicial tools that already allow courts to waive, suspend or modify fines and costs based on individualized findings. He noted restitution to victims is not delayed under the bill but argued fines, costs and other financial sanctions are a meaningful component of accountability and victims' sense of recourse.
Tobin said courts already can tailor financial sanctions through indigency hearings, payment plans, waivers, community service and other tools and that a blanket six-month delay would remove individualized judicial discretion. Committee members pressed Tobin on whether judges in some areas behave inconsistently and on how many people are indigent; Tobin said he did not have specific data on the share of indigent defendants but noted that many criminal defendants use indigent defense. No committee vote was recorded and the hearing concluded.
