Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clark County Ethics Commission defers leadership election, approves minutes and takes actions on two complaints

Clark County Ethics Commission · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its meeting the commission deferred the election of chair and vice chair, approved November minutes, moved presentations to the next meeting, continued one complaint due to recusal, ordered an investigation for complaint 202510, and ruled complaint 202601 did not allege an ethics violation.

The Clark County Ethics Commission handled routine administrative business and acted on two formal complaints at its recent meeting.

Commissioner Murray opened the meeting, confirmed a quorum with Commissioner Rourke present and moved to continue the election of the chair and vice chair to the next scheduled meeting; the motion was seconded and passed by voice vote. The commission then opened public comment but staff reported no members of the public were present and no comments were offered.

The commission approved the minutes from its November meeting after a motion and second, and then voted to continue scheduled refresher presentations on the Open Public Meetings Act, the Public Records Act, the Ethics Code and Robert's Rules of Order to the next meeting. Commissioner Murray said the presentations were intended as a light refresher and a welcome to the incoming commissioner.

On complaints, the commission continued consideration of complaint number 202509 after Murray recused himself because he is an active attorney who practices before the superior court employee named in that complaint. After an executive session, the commission voted that sufficient cause exists to warrant an investigation of complaint number 202510 (filed by Bob Williamson) and directed county staff to conduct the inquiry and report back. Separately, the commission ruled that the allegations in complaint number 202601 (filed by Sharon Ladd) did not constitute an ethics violation.

Katie Joma of the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney's Office introduced herself as the commission's incoming legal representative; Amber Smith, civil deputy prosecuting attorney, offered farewell remarks. With no further business the commission adjourned.