Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Data‑center measure debated over fees and renewable requirements; committee narrows some provisions
Summary
The committee debated a substitute for HB 2515 on emerging large energy‑use facilities (ELUFs). Sponsors and opponents sparred over a proposed ELUF fee and requirements that new or expanded facilities secure new renewable resources; the committee adopted an amendment removing the annual fee and reported the substitute by a close roll call.
Lawmakers spent substantial time on HB 2515, a measure aimed at emerging large energy‑use facilities (ELUFs) such as large data centers and virtual currency mining operations. Staff outlined a proposed second substitute that extends timing for resource requirements and modifies the fee structure; briefers cited projected revenue and detailed how funds would be allocated to higher education and other accounts.
Debate balanced concerns about grid reliability, the need for new generation, workforce and union standards, and ratepayer impacts. Representative D'Alessio warned that the new‑resource requirement is intended to keep the lights on as new ELUF loads materialize; supporters framed fee revenue as funding for low‑income utility assistance and higher‑education priorities. Opponents, including Representative Dye, said the proposal functions as a tax on the industry and risks discouraging investment and jobs.
During amendment votes, the committee declined one amendment that would have required new utilities to come from new generators (McFadden 154) but adopted McFadden 153 eliminating the annual fee. After further debate, the committee reported the second substitute by a close roll call (tally announced as 16 ayes, 14 nays and 1 excused). The margin reflected the policy trade‑offs between protecting ratepayers and encouraging new investment. Staff emphasized that several fiscal impacts remain indeterminate pending later CCA or UTC actions and anticipated rulemaking.
The substitute will move to the House floor where sponsors expect further amendments and technical adjustments, and where legislators and stakeholders will press the balance between utility reliability, environmental goals, and economic development.
