Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flag Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ohio senator seeks to protect 'thin blue line' flag after homeowners association dispute
Summary
Sen. Schafer introduced Senate Bill 202, the Chief Steven DeCerio Act, to add the thin blue line flag to the state's list of protected flags after a homeowners association forced a grieving father to remove a flag presented at his son's funeral. Committee members questioned constitutional limits and whether the legislature should single out one cause flag.
Get email alerts on the Flag Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sen. Schafer offered sponsor testimony for Senate Bill 202, proposing to add the thin blue line flag to a statutory list of protected flags alongside the U.S. flag and military banners. Schafer said the measure is named for fallen Kirkersville Police Chief Steven DeCerio and grew out of an incident in which DeCerio's father was ordered by a homeowners association to remove a flag given at his son's funeral.
"This is a grieving father who was just trying to honor and remember his son," Schafer said, framing the bill as relief for families who use flags as memorials. She told the committee the measure aims to prevent landlords, park operators or neighborhood organizations from forcing residents to take down the thin blue line flag.
During questioning, Sen. DeMora and other members asked whether private covenants or homeowners association rules might limit flag displays and whether the First Amendment provides a defense to HOA enforcement. Schafer acknowledged she is not a First Amendment lawyer and described the conflict as contractual — that residents often agree to HOA rules when they move into a community — but argued the legislature can decide which flags the state protects.
Ranking Member Weinstein asked what limiting principle would allow the state to protect the thin blue line flag while excluding other cause-related flags such as a thin red line for firefighters. Schafer replied that the legislature exercises discretion when setting protected flags and that this bill responds to families who were deeply offended by an HOA's actions.
The committee took no vote on SB 202 at the first hearing. The measure advanced to a first hearing for sponsor testimony; further legal analysis about private covenants, HOA authority and constitutional limits was raised but not resolved.
Next steps: SB 202 concluded its first hearing and will return for additional consideration or committee action at a later date.
