Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Audit Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

External audit gives Hopkinsville clean opinion; city finance director outlines revenue pressures

Hopkinsville City Council · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

External auditors delivered a clean opinion on Hopkinsville’s FY 2024–25 financial statements; auditors and finance staff identified cash and capital balances but flagged lower payroll and insurance premium tax collections and an $800,000 construction payroll shortfall affecting payroll tax revenues.

An external audit and the city’s monthly financial presentation provided a mix of reassurances and warnings at Hopkinsville’s Feb. 17 council meeting.

Kelly Webb, CPA and engagement partner at York, Neil and Associates, presented the annual comprehensive financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, and said the auditors issued an unmodified (clean) opinion: "the financial statements... present fairly in all material respects." Webb summarized key figures including unrestricted cash and investments of about $31,000,000, capital assets (net of depreciation) around $62,000,000, and total bonds/notes/leases liabilities near $59,000,000. The report noted a positive change in net position of approximately $9.6 million and that the city met single‑audit compliance requirements for the major federal program tested (COVID/ARPA funds).

Following the audit, city finance director Melissa Clayton presented January monthly financials. Clayton said payroll tax collections show a 4.4% deficit year‑to‑date while property tax receipts were about $140,000 ahead of budget through January. She said insurance premium tax collections were down for the month (about 6.5%) and business license receipts were down roughly 4.5%. Clayton attributed roughly $800,000 of the payroll‑tax shortfall to lower construction payroll collections after three large construction firms stopped submitting payroll tax in the most recent comparison period.

Clayton gave fund‑level context: the general fund was running at about 55.9% of budget midway through the fiscal year, municipal road aid at 80.3%, capital fund at about 61.5%, and the city’s cash fund balance was reported near $18,000,007. The auditor and finance director said they found no deficiencies in internal control and no material noncompliance that would affect the audit opinion.

Council members asked clarifying questions about month‑to‑month collection timing and whether weather or delayed remittances affected reported variances; Clayton said some monthly timing effects are possible and that she expects February collections to provide additional clarity.

The audit presentation and monthly financials were accepted and recorded in the meeting minutes; council members said they would continue monitoring revenue trends while the compensation debate continued.