Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Safety Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District seeks bids for new IP-based PA system; PCCD grant covers part of roughly $900,000 estimate
Summary
Facilities staff proposed converting aging analog public-address systems to an IP-based platform with visual displays and emergency integration, giving a preliminary cost of about $900,000 for districtwide replacement; the district has $212,681 in PCCD funding and would seek additional grants and capital reserves to cover the remainder.
Manheim Township facilities staff urged the board to authorize development of competitive bid specifications for a districtwide public-address (PA) and emergency-notification replacement that would move the district from analog amplifiers to an IP-based, networked speaker and messaging platform.
Presenters said the existing PA signal chain is largely analog, decades old in parts, and lacks integration with emergency-management and voice-over-IP systems. An IP-based platform would allow software-driven zones, scrolling visual alerts for ADA accessibility, silent-text notifications and easier prerecorded messaging. Presenters cited examples of endpoint hardware with text displays and color coding to indicate incident type and said integration with access-control and camera systems would allow more precise alerts.
The preliminary budget presented to the committee was roughly $900,000 for a districtwide installation; presenters said $212,681 has already been allocated from the PCCD grant and that the district would expect to use capital reserve or fund balance to cover the remaining roughly $700,000 while pursuing other grants (for example DOJ/COPS school-violence-prevention programs) to reduce the district share.
Facilities staff asked the committee to authorize issuing an RFP and seeking competitive proposals; they emphasized the board was not being asked to approve a purchase tonight but to authorize development of bid specifications and to allow the competitive process to proceed so proposals can be returned with full vendor warranties and installation costs for board review and a later vote.
Board members discussed phasing, warranty questions and whether a smaller interim upgrade would meet immediate needs. Presenters said staff prefer a single-platform approach to achieve integration, ADA accessibility, and simpler long-term maintenance and argued that a competitive RFP will reveal cost variants and alternatives. The facilities team also flagged larger multiyear-plan items, including a Phase 2 campus project budgeted at $8.1 million and a variety of technology and building-maintenance items that will require prioritization and sequencing.
The committee did not vote to purchase; presenters will return procurements and recommended vendor selections to the board at a future business meeting.
