Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Tustin Unified board actions Nov. 18 — organizational meeting, HRA account, and remand of Title IX resolution

Tustin Unified School District Board of Education · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Nov. 18 meeting the TUSD board approved scheduling the annual organizational meeting (Dec. 8), authorized an HRA bank account, and remanded Resolution 11‑33‑25 (Title IX/state-law conflict) to staff and legal counsel (vote 3‑1‑1). Several pupil‑personnel SN items were also approved under consent.

The Tustin Unified School District board took several formal actions during its Nov. 18 meeting:

• Establish annual/organizational meeting: The board approved a motion to establish the annual organizational meeting (scheduled for Dec. 8). The motion was seconded and carried by voice vote.

• Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) account (Resolution 11‑32‑25): Trustees authorized establishment of an HRA bank account; staff identified Citibank as the recommended bank and the motion carried.

• Resolution 11‑33‑25 (Title IX vs state law): After extensive public comment, the board voted to remand the resolution to district staff and legal counsel for review. The motion passed with three in favor, one no and one abstention. The board instructed the superintendent to return with staff and counsel recommendations before any further board action.

• Consent calendar and pupil personnel actions: The board approved the consent calendar and moved multiple pupil personnel items (SN numbers) by voice vote; individual SN items (e.g., SN252601, SN25262, SN2526.0.3) were moved, seconded and carried as recorded in the transcript.

No final policy changes were adopted on Resolution 11‑33‑25; the remand requires a staff and legal analysis to be returned to the board for future consideration.