Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the License Plates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel hears HB 25-85 to create Delta Waterfowl specialty license plate with royalties

House Committee on Transportation · February 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB 25-85 would authorize a Delta Waterfowl distinctive license plate with a board-set annual royalty between $25 and $100, require 250 preorders for production, and set issuance to begin 01/01/2027; proponents from Delta Waterfowl testified in support.

The House Committee on Transportation heard House Bill 25-85, which would authorize a Delta Waterfowl distinctive license plate in Kansas. Committee staff summarized key bill provisions: the sponsoring organization’s board would set an annual royalty fee between $25 and $100; the plate would follow the statutory distinctive plate requirements, require 250 initial preorders before production, and the sponsoring organization must cover up to $5,000 in initial design costs. The bill’s effective date for statutory provisions is 07/01/2026, with license issuance beginning 01/01/2027.

Jeff Reed (Mississippi and Central Flyway), who submitted written testimony, appeared and offered to answer questions about the organization’s mission and the logistics of a specialty plate. Jordan Ford, chairman of the Wichita chapter of Delta Waterfowl, testified virtually about the group’s Kansas presence: "Delta Waterfowl has roughly 500 members, 4 chapters that are active with more than 40 volunteers," and volunteers have "put more than $50,000 back into the state" since 2016 through recruitment and outreach programs. Ford said a distinctive plate would help recruit conservation-minded hunters and raise funds for local conservation and youth programs.

Members asked limited procedural questions about assigning funds and whether the sponsoring organization could direct royalties to a 501(c)(3); Reed said shifting funding to the foundation arm would not be an issue. No opponents or neutral witnesses appeared in the record. The committee closed the hearing on HB 25-85.