Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee refines bylaws language, updates staff roles and meeting rules; council liaison reports name change and hires
Summary
Members revised bylaws language to clarify the council liaison role, replace 'recording secretary' with 'board administrator,' adjust meeting notification procedures and debate voting/abstention rules; council liaison reported the committee’s name change and upcoming code‑compliance hiring.
The Englewood City Code Enforcement Advisory Committee spent substantial time Feb. 11 revising bylaws language to clarify internal roles and procedures and received a council liaison report on administrative changes.
The chair read proposed language specifying the council liaison’s duties as the committee’s primary representative to City Council, responsible for conveying committee recommendations and reporting council developments back to the committee. The chair said the language was drafted from the Jan. meeting discussion and asked members for comments; there were no objections to the wording so far.
Members agreed to replace multiple references to “recording secretary” in the bylaws with “board administrator” (Shelley) and to require that members notify both the chair and the board administrator when they will be absent. The committee also discussed changing the meeting frequency wording from “ad hoc” to “monthly” and removing a three‑day notice clause that applies only when meetings are truly ad hoc.
There was extended discussion about voting obligations and abstentions. One member noted a bylaws sentence that read members had a duty to vote unless they had a conflict of interest; staff said they would seek clarification from the city attorney on whether abstentions are permissible under applicable rules of order and how conflicts of interest should be recorded.
Rita Russell, the council liaison, told the committee the municipal code had been updated and the body’s name is now the Code Compliance Advisory Committee. Russell said the chronic‑nuisance ordinance will go to City Council study session next Monday and that she would raise due‑process concerns there. Staff reported the city extended an offer to a new code‑compliance officer and expected onboarding within 30 days; the park ranger and seasonal hires are also in process.
The committee agreed to make the suggested bylaw changes, return them to the committee for a final review, and forward the approved version through the city clerk and city attorney as required.
