Public speakers urge Watchung Hills board to keep Policy 57‑56; members defer decision to Sept. 30

The Watchung Hills Regional High School District Board of Education spent the bulk of its Sept. 9 work session on public comment and discussion about Policy 57‑56, a district rule that governs protections for transgender students and their use of school facilities and participation in athletics. Speakers and several board members said they wanted more time and legal clarity before any repeal or revision.

Patty O’Byrne, a resident who addressed the board, urged trustees not to move ahead while related litigation continues, noting that federal courts and appeals remain active on similar policies. "Why are we wasting the time? Let the legal process play out," she said, adding that local action could be rendered moot by higher‑court decisions.

Marissa Walsh, identified at the meeting as president of the Pawtchat Hills Regional Education Association, told the board faculty and staff strongly favor keeping the policy in place. "Revoking the policy . . . may make a trans kid not be alive," Walsh said, arguing that the policy gives vulnerable students a perception of safety and that removing it could increase their risk of harm.

Speakers opposing the policy also addressed sports safety and parental notification. Ginger Ari said she supported repeal on the grounds of competitive fairness and safety in athletics; Susan Kelly described personal discomfort in a locker‑room interaction and asked whether policy language could ensure safety for all students.

Board members framed the debate in procedural and legal terms. Several trustees reiterated that removing the written policy would not, by itself, alter state law or the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association (NJSIAA) eligibility rules that govern competition. School officials noted existing legal obligations (for example, mandatory reporting requirements for suspected abuse) would remain in force regardless of local policy changes.

Multiple board members said the matter warranted more time. In keeping with the district's practice for work sessions, trustees said formal votes are usually reserved for business meetings. The board agreed to continue the discussion and to place any final vote on the Sept. 30 business meeting agenda.

What happens next: The board scheduled further deliberation at the Sept. 30 business meeting. If trustees place a motion to rescind or replace Policy 57‑56 on that agenda, the public will have additional opportunity to comment and the board will record any formal motion and roll‑call vote at that business session.