Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah Senate adopts compromise regulation on kratom after extended debate

Utah State Senate · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers substituted and passed SB 45, narrowing allowable kratom products to raw/pure leaf sold in specialty shops with new regulatory authority for the Department of Agriculture; debate split between advocates of a ban and supporters of a tightly controlled regulatory approach.

The Utah Senate on Monday substituted and passed a second substitute of Senate Bill 45 to narrow and regulate kratom sales in the state, moving the issue from broad prohibition to a controlled-availability model.

Senator McKell, sponsor of the floor substitute, said the change is a compromise reached in negotiations with the House that would allow the sale of "pure leaf" kratom in a limited retail channel while eliminating what he called the majority of the unsafe market. "This will eliminate 90 plus percent of our problem in the state of Utah, but we are going to allow for some pure kratom leaf to be sold in the state," the sponsor said.

The substitute removes kratom from general retail and confines sales to specialty tobacco/"vape" shops with behind-the-counter rules and a 21-and-over requirement, and adds enforcement tools for the Department of Agriculture. Supporters argued the substitute addresses adulterated or extracted products thought to drive most harms while allowing raw-leaf products sold in tightly regulated channels.

Opponents said regulation creates a more complex enforcement regime and raised cost concerns. Senator Brammer said his preference would be an outright ban: "I'd prefer to just be done with kratom, not have a regulatory environment related to it," he said. Proponents countered that banning some alkaloids (notably 7‑OH) and tightly limiting sales is more practicable and that federal and military bans of certain extracts support stricter controls.

Several senators described how the proposed language mirrors regulatory approaches used for hemp-derived products and limits the presence of problematic alkaloids. Senator Vickers, who has sponsored related measures, urged support and noted the bill narrows products to raw kratom with very low trace amounts of certain alkaloids.

After substitution and floor debate, the Senate voted to adopt the second substitute; the clerk read the result as the substitute passed and the bill will be transmitted to the House for its consideration.

Next steps: The substituted SB 45 will be returned to the House; the bill's regulatory details (testing thresholds, licensing and enforcement) will be implemented through statutory language and Department of Agriculture rulemaking if the House concurs and the bill becomes law.