Committee reports SB170 after sponsor says bill will require remuneration language in future noncompete agreements
Loading...
Summary
Senator McPike told the committee SB170, prompted by a constituent's layoff, would require future noncompete contracts to include compensation provisions; the committee reported SB170 by a 7–0 vote with no public testimony recorded.
Senator McPike presented SB170 to the committee as legislation prompted by a laid-off constituent who faced limitations from a noncompete clause. "It came to me from a constituent actually laid off, this year," McPike said, and described the bill's aim: to create protections so that future noncompete contracts include an associated form of remuneration.
McPike emphasized the bill would not change the sponsor's current contract but would require that future noncompete agreements provide stipulated compensation for the restrictions they impose. He said the bill "is really to create awareness and prevent and making sure there's some form of remuneration that is stipulated in noncompete contracts." McPike also noted that changes to section C were made on the Senate side and that those changes are in proper posture before this committee.
A member moved and seconded to report SB170; the committee voted to report the bill by a tally recorded as 7 to 0. No witnesses were recorded in favor or opposition online or in the room. The committee adjourned and expects a larger docket next week.
The measure advances to the next stage of the legislative process; the transcript records sponsor explanation and the committee's unanimous report, but no external testimony or fiscal details were provided during this hearing.
