Committee hears bill to add continuing education and limited student licenses for respiratory therapists

Michigan House Rules Committee · February 19, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Thompson told the committee House Bill 51‑50 would require 15 continuing‑education hours for respiratory‑therapist license renewal, create a limited license for second‑year students with patient restrictions, and align statutory definitions with current practice. The committee asked clarification questions; no vote was taken.

Representative Thompson presented House Bill 51‑50 to the House Rules Committee, saying the measure would require 15 clock hours of continuing education at licensing renewal, create a limited license for second‑year respiratory‑therapy students, and align statutory language with current clinical practice.

"This limited license will be granted the second year of the student's program," Thompson said, describing safeguards: student practitioners would not perform tasks on ICU patients or children and would always work under supervising respiratory therapists. Thompson said the change replaces an earlier certified respiratory credential and would bring uniformity across training sites.

Emma, identified by Thompson as her director, confirmed the only new rule in the bill is the limited license provision and described it as replacing the previous certified credential. Committee members asked whether the bill necessitated new rule promulgation and whether additional FTEs would be required; Thompson answered the bill opens statutory sections for rulemaking and said no new full‑time staff would be required, noting oversight duties would fall to existing EMS or licensing divisions.

Committee members did not take a vote on House Bill 51‑50 during this hearing; Thompson offered to answer follow‑up questions and staff signaled further review of statutory cross‑references.