Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cedar City receives clean audit; council urged to press staff on controls
Summary
Auditor Caleb Reis told the Cedar City Council the city earned an unqualified opinion with no material weaknesses, highlighted roughly $30 million in capital reinvestment and urged councilmembers to actively question expenditures and vendors.
Cedar City received an unqualified (clean) audit opinion on its financial statements, the city’s contracted auditor told the City Council on Monday. Auditor Caleb Reis said the auditors found no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal controls and that the financial statements are "materially correct."
The audit review noted roughly $15 million in capital additions in the general fund and another $15 million in utility‑fund infrastructure, a net reinvestment of about $30 million into city infrastructure. Reis also reported the city’s cash and investments in the General Fund totaled about $21,000,000 and that the unassigned fund balance rose by approximately $3,500,000 to about $15,000,000 — roughly 41% of operating expenditures.
Reis reminded the council that auditors perform a single‑audit on federal programs; this year the airport improvement program accounted for over 90% of federally tested dollars and also received a clean result. He emphasized the council’s fiduciary role and encouraged members to ask staff questions about vendors and line items, noting the state auditor may scrutinize oversight if fraud or negligence is suspected.
Finance staff clarified that the audit is a presentation and not a matter for formal approval by the council. Council members asked follow‑up questions about bond amortization for water revenue bonds, restrictions on certain fund balances and what is included in restricted funds; staff answered that the city has amortized debt and explained the difference between restricted liabilities (such as developer cash bonds) and available fund balances.
The presentation concluded with staff noting plans for rate studies for water, sewer and storm drain funds and that the 2025–26 budget includes several large utility projects, including about $30 million of planned water projects. The council did not record a formal vote on the audit presentation itself.
