Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Transparency Shelter topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges daily warming centers and questions prosecutor transparency, Rutgers artifacts loan
Summary
During public comment, New Brunswick resident Charlie Crabbe asked about a Rutgers artifacts loan, urged nightly winter sheltering and questioned why the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office did not publicly disclose details of a police officer's plea deal.
Charlie Crabbe, who identified himself as living in New Brunswick, used the public-comment period to raise several separate issues. He asked about Resolution 198, described in the agenda as a memorandum of agreement regarding the loan of artifacts with Rutgers, and requested clarification whether Rutgers is loaning artifacts to the county or vice versa.
Crabbe then turned to sheltering and homelessness, asking, "Is tonight a code blue night?" and urging the county to coordinate with the city of New Brunswick to open shelters nightly in winter. He said, "Without a warming center open, folks are gonna be left out in the cold tonight," and asked the commissioners to do more to prevent people from being exposed to cold overnight.
Crabbe also pressed the board on police-transparency issues, alleging that two of three county-supervised law enforcement agencies were late in posting the attorney general's internal affairs policies and that the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office had only posted an incomplete internal affairs summary. He read from an email he said he had sent to the prosecutor's public information office, asking why the MCPO had not issued public statements about the case of "Ryan p Alcott," a police officer Crabbe said had resigned as part of a plea agreement. Crabbe said he received only an acknowledgement that his inquiry was forwarded to the prosecutor and first assistant and that he expected a follow-up from the public information officer.
The transcript records the resident's questions and the county's initial acknowledgement but does not show a substantive public response from the prosecutor's office or a board action addressing his concerns within the provided excerpt.
The public-comment exchange touched on three distinct matters (Resolution 198/Rutgers artifacts; data center planning in New Brunswick; sheltering/code blue; and MCPO transparency). Officials did not provide final resolutions to the resident's requests in the provided transcript, and the resident asked for follow-up.
