Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pud Marina Lane topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves preliminary PUD for multiuse residential development at 460 Marina Lane
Summary
The Site Plan Review Committee voted to approve a preliminary planned unit development at 460 Marina Lane that includes a five‑story senior apartment building, six single‑story condominiums and a memory‑care CBRF, subject to staff conditions and subsequent engineering and permitting steps.
The Ashwaubenon Site Plan Review Committee approved Aug. 7 a preliminary planned unit development (PUD) for a market‑rate, multiuse residential project at 460 Marina Lane.
Staff described the project as three components: a memory‑care Community Based Residential Facility (CBRF), a five‑story senior apartment building with covered parking, and six single‑story condominium units. The parcel sits along the Fox River and includes a retention pond; the property is zoned B3 (community business), which triggered the preliminary PUD review.
Aaron, a village planning staff member, outlined required next steps and conditions: a final PUD packet with detailed civil and utility plans, a lighting and photometrics plan (light trespass limited to 0.5 foot‑candles at property boundaries or no more than existing on site), coordination with Brown County Highway for driveway access on County Highway H, and Airport Director approval for any building above 50 feet because the apartment building would exceed 50 feet. Public safety requested a private fire hydrant and coordination on fire department connection and Knox Box locations.
A developer representative who identified himself as James Hunt addressed committee questions on stormwater and market mix. Hunt said preliminary engineering indicates the existing retention pond was built to accommodate the parcel and that the team does not believe soil remediation is required but will consult the Wisconsin DNR as the design develops. He confirmed townhomes (condominiums) are planned as for‑sale units while the apartment building and the memory‑care CBRF would be rental facilities.
Dan Pamperin moved to approve the preliminary PUD with staff conditions; Gary Paul seconded and the motion carried with no recorded opposition. The item will proceed to the Planning Commission that evening and later to the Village Board for preliminary PUD consideration; a final PUD packet and engineered plans will return to staff and committees for final approval and permitting.
