Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Missouri committee hears bill to update St. Louis teachers retirement quorum after board grows to 13
Summary
House Bill 3208 would change statutory language to reflect that the St. Louis Teachers Retirement System has grown from 11 to 13 trustees and now requires seven members to constitute a quorum; committee members raised concerns that the drafting could lower the effective voting threshold to four votes and asked staff to review board rules.
House members of the Missouri House Committee on Pensions on Monday heard testimony on House Bill 3208, sponsored by Representative Hovis, which would update state law to reflect that the St. Louis Teachers Retirement System’s board has increased from 11 to 13 members and to set seven members as the quorum requirement.
Representative Hovis, the bill sponsor, told the committee the change is intended to "update the statute to now mirror how many members is on that board." He said the board’s membership was expanded last year when the Senate added two seats for charter-school representatives so those schools would have representation on the retirement system board.
Committee members pressed the sponsor on the practical effect of the drafting. Representative Clemens warned that the bill appears to shift "from a constitutional majority required to pass something to the majority of a quorum to pass something," and said staff should compare the statutory language with the board’s operating rules to determine whether corrections are needed. Representative Bromley asked why the board was increased and was told the Senate added the seats to provide charter schools with representation. Representative Boyko expressed concern that, as written, the statute could allow decisions to be carried by as few as four members, giving a single voting bloc outsized influence.
Anne Teshulte, a registered lobbyist for the St. Louis Public School Retirement System, testified in support. She told the committee she had spoken with the system’s executive director and that the system’s attorney had "mirrored the language that was in their operating rules," and she said she would follow up with the board’s staff and report back to the committee if the language requires revision.
The committee took no vote during the hearing. Committee members indicated they would have staff review the retirement system’s rules and the bill’s drafting to determine whether the statutory language should be amended before any committee action. The hearing concluded with no formal motion or recorded vote on House Bill 3208.
