Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Access Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommends denial of zone change at 2241 S. 5400 W., citing inadequate second access
Summary
Hurricane Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of a zone change (ZC25-16) for property near 2241 S. 5400 W., saying the developer had not guaranteed a required secondary paved access. The commission asked the City Council to explore a development-agreement pathway to resolve access and safety concerns.
Hurricane City Planning Commission on Dec. 11 recommended that the City Council deny a proposed zone change (ZC25-16) for property near 2241 South 5400 West, saying public facilities — primarily a guaranteed secondary paved access — are not in place.
The applicant’s representative, Bob Hermanson of Bush and Gudgel, told the commission the developer has coordinated with adjoining landowners and revisited utilities, and that the project’s updated zoning plan envisions two access points and utility extensions. “We’ve visited with all of the utility companies,” Hermanson said, adding that sewer, water, power and gas checks in the prior two weeks “reverified that everything is ready and available to service the site.”
Staff and the joint-utility committee pushed back. Staff said the proposed secondary access was not dedicated, bonded or constructed and that the agreements among private owners did not provide the city a reliable enforcement mechanism. “We still recommend denial,” staff stated, citing inadequate public facilities to support the proposed development and noting the fire district’s prior direction that a second improved (paved) access is required once development exceeds certain thresholds under the fire code.
Commission discussion centered on whether a development agreement, bonding or dedicated right-of-way could protect the city from risk if a zone change were granted. Commissioners recognized the applicant’s stated willingness to build or bond the road as part of a preliminary plat, but several said the commission’s rules and past experience counsel caution about granting zones when infrastructure assurances are incomplete.
Paul Farthing moved that the commission recommend denial of ZC25-16 to the City Council “based on the findings the public facilities are inadequate to support the development.” The motion passed by voice vote; commissioners also asked the City Council to consider whether a development agreement recorded against the property could provide the needed guarantees and urged urgency in resolving the second-access safety issue.
The commission’s recommendation is advisory; the City Council will make the final decision. Staff and the applicant indicated they expect to pursue the matter further at the council level, where detailed development-agreement terms, dedications or bonding arrangements could be worked out.
