Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lompoc revises graffiti ordinance, keeps city assistance option and tightens consent rules
Summary
Council approved updates to the city’s graffiti code including clarifying that murals require written owner permission, making possession of marking tools an offense only when intended for defacement, extending compliance windows, and retaining a city assistance/volunteer abatement option for public‑facing property.
The council took up a revised anti‑graffiti ordinance that reworks definitions, notice and compliance timeframes, retailer signage, and a city assistance provision intended to help property owners remove graffiti quickly.
City Attorney (unnamed) explained the legal framing for nuisance findings: "detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare is kind of like legal legal lingo that is used when you're trying to define what a public nuisance is." The council and staff negotiated several edits to address practical enforcement concerns raised by members and the public.
Key changes adopted in the final motion:
- Require written permission for authorized murals or art to avoid ambiguity when enforcement is pursued on private buildings. - Make possession of indelible markers or spray paint an offense only if possessed "for the purpose of defacing, marking, or damaging" property (intent requirement). - Extend property‑owner compliance time frames to 15 days (council compromise after debate about revictimizing owners); staff will continue to use expedited calendar for urgent public‑facing locations when possible. - Retain and clarify the city assistance clause: if a property owner reports graffiti promptly, staff will coordinate volunteer or city resources to help abate public‑facing graffiti when feasible.
Public input highlighted competing concerns: business owners and residents asked for fast removal and assistance; councilmembers emphasized fairness to victims and the need for resources to respond (Solid Waste staff noted an existing part‑time graffiti abatement position and supplies).
The ordinance passed 5‑0 with the amendments. Staff will update enforcement procedures and public materials (reporting forms and timelines) and said they will continue to coordinate volunteer and city abatement for public‑facing incidents.
