Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nevada County supervisors approve resolution supporting California Proposition 36 after heated debate
Summary
After presentations from the district attorney, sheriff and law-enforcement supporters and a wide-ranging public comment period, the board voted to adopt a resolution endorsing Proposition 36; two supervisors abstained while three voted yes.
The Nevada County Board of Supervisors considered and adopted a resolution on Oct. 8 supporting California Proposition 36, the Homelessness, Drug Addiction and Theft Reduction Act. Staff provided an overview: Prop 36 would reverse elements of Proposition 47 by reclassifying certain theft and specified drug offenses as felonies, creating mandated-treatment felony offenses for some repeat hard-drug possession cases and authorizing longer sentences in some circumstances. The Legislative Analyst Office (as cited in the staff packet) projects potential increases in prison and state-custody populations and related impacts on grant funding previously created by Prop 47.
District Attorney Jesse Wilson and Sheriff Moon spoke in favor, saying Prop 36 restores prosecutorial tools and treatment mandates for repeat offenders and would help local businesses and public safety. Supporters cited national and statewide endorsements and polling they said showed strong public backing. Opponents and some supervisors raised concerns about fiscal impacts on county behavioral-health services, treatment-bed capacity and whether the county should adopt positions on statewide ballot measures.
After public comment and board deliberations, the board voted on the resolution. Roll call: Districts 2, 4 and 3 voted Yes; Districts 1 and 5 recorded Abstain. The motion carried. Several supervisors said they supported law enforcement and the intent to address retail theft and repeated offending but had reservations about fiscal impacts and precedent for county positions on statewide ballot measures.
