Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glenarden City residents press council on rules-review committee, parking permits and municipal elevator contract
Summary
At the Jan. 13 Glenarden City meeting, citizens objected to a proposal to create a rules-review committee and urged caution on proposed residential parking permit changes; one commenter also asked that sponsors be listed on a resolution awarding a contract for a municipal elevator.
An unnamed resident urged the Glenarden City Council on Jan. 13 to reject a proposal to form a small rules-review committee and to delay any expansion of the city’s residential parking permit (RPP) program until the program’s effectiveness can be assessed.
The commenter said the council’s rules are not so complex as to require a separate review committee and that “the whole council should be involved in whatever adjustments or changes” rather than a smaller committee. On the RPP matter, the resident questioned increasing permits from two to three, saying the change “might just defeat your purpose” by increasing cars on neighborhood streets.
The chair responded that R18 (the rules-review committee) should be removed from the packet and that language proposing a third parking pass had already been removed from R19; the chair said the council agreed to add a section of Johnson Avenue (between Hay Street and Glen Arbor Parkway) and Johnson Court to the RPP program following work-session discussion. A staff member, Mr. Green, estimated adding the two streets would take 30 to 45 days because the needed infrastructure is already in place and the primary task is issuing notices.
A separate public comment asked that R23 — a resolution to award a construction contract for a municipal elevator at the James R. Cousins Jr. Municipal Center — list Councilman Herring and Councilman Harrison as sponsors because, the speaker said, they initiated the project.
No votes on those resolutions were recorded during the public-comment meeting; the council adopted the meeting agenda by consent and later moved into a closed session. The meeting record shows the R19 proposal had been revised in committee and that implementation steps for the targeted streets are expected to be largely administrative, with notices issued to residents before enforcement.
What happens next: the council will consider formal action on pending resolutions at a future public session; staff said local implementation of the RPP additions could take roughly one to one-and-a-half months if the council proceeds.
