Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Classification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gage County defers decision on 'shouse' valuation after appraisers disagree
Summary
The board struck parcel 001612000 (Casey Lenters) from today's change list and set a July 24 hearing after staff and appraisers disagreed whether a metal 'shouse' is a dwelling or a machine shed and how to value it.
The Gage County Board of Equalization on July 10 deferred a contested valuation for Casey Lenters (parcel 001612000) after an extended exchange among appraisers, staff and board members about whether a metal building with living space should be treated as a machine shed or a residence.
Assessor staff and appraisers described differing measurements and cost treatments: staff appraiser Josh had an earlier figure cited around $525,800 for total value; the property owner had sought a lower figure (the owner’s requested number was recorded in the hearing as approximately $411,680). Appraiser Lloyd questioned whether some of the structure should be classified as a machine shed rather than living area, which led to materially different building square‑foot rates and totals. Staff discussed current cost‑tables (Marshall & Swift) and whether those manuals keep pace with modern 'barndominium' or 'shouse' conversions.
Patty (chairing staff) said she would "overrule" the appraiser’s recommendation in light of the new information and recommended notifying the owner and rescheduling so the owner could appear. Board member Dorn moved to remove parcel 001612000 from the change list for today and put it on the July 24 agenda; Swavely seconded. The board recorded the motion carried.
Why it matters: classification of mixed metal shop/housing structures affects assessed values because appraisal tables and per‑square‑foot costs differ for unheated/unfinished machine sheds versus finished living space, producing large swings in assessed value when classification changes.
Next steps: the parcel will be placed on the July 24 agenda so appraisers, staff and the owner can reconcile differences and allow the owner an opportunity to testify or provide documentation.
