Grant County tables 2.7% CPI pay adjustments for elected officials pending broader payroll and occupational tax review
Loading...
Summary
The fiscal court voted to table proposed 2.7% CPI pay adjustments for magistrates, the coroner and the county attorney to allow the court to review the county’s budget, the recently raised occupational tax and other pay considerations; citizens and staff urged clearer communication about how CPI adjustments and other raises are applied.
Grant County Fiscal Court voted on Feb. 17, 2026 to table line items that would adjust compensation for certain elected officials — including magistrates, the coroner and the county attorney — at the 2.7% Consumer Price Index (CPI) rate issued by the Department for Local Government.
Court members cited KRS 64.527, which authorizes CPI-based adjustments for elected officials. The judge explained that adopting an increase would be retroactive to Jan. 1, 2026 if the court later approves it. Several magistrates expressed concern about approving pay adjustments now while the court is simultaneously evaluating the county’s occupational tax (recently raised to 2.5%) and other budget pressures. One magistrate asked that these related decisions be reviewed together for forecasting and cash-flow reasons; the court voted to table items c, d and e until a later meeting for further review.
During public comment, county employees and residents urged clarity. Tony asked whether a later approval would apply retroactively; the judge confirmed it would. Resident Chris requested a written explanation to department heads describing the CPI adjustment process and what it means for elected officials and county employees, noting animosity among staff when raises have been absent in prior years. Court members said elected officials automatically receive the CPI notice but that raises for other county employees are handled during the annual budget process (county fiscal year: July 1–June 30) and depend on available funds.
Court members also discussed the broader fiscal context, noting that the jail’s rising costs have strained the general fund and that the resolution supporting House Bill 557 is part of a strategy to address those pressures before altering the occupational tax or employee compensation permanently. The court’s tabling vote preserves options while staff and magistrates examine cash-flow, budget forecasts and the potential effects of lowering the occupational tax.
