Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Participatory Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Principals describe community-driven staffing pilots as district weighs program trade-offs
Summary
Three Mesa principals told the board that participatory staffing pilots—engaging families, staff and students—produced ideas such as arts-and-science emphases but also raised concerns about staff stretch, equity, and the need for district-level coordination.
Three principals presented results from a participatory staffing pilot to the Mesa Public Schools governing board on Feb. 12, describing how small-group focus meetings with families, staff and students generated program proposals but also flagged real trade-offs.
Principal Holly Chang (Washington) said roughly 13 families took part in after-school meetings and a student survey; the group landed on an arts-and-science emphasis (STEAM) and suggested changing 'specials' offerings and program emphases. Chang cautioned that creating specialized programs would likely require contract adjustments and shifting some support duties (e.g., cafeteria, supervision) onto other staff.
Dr. Tinich (O'Connor) said the school used multi-stakeholder focus groups with representation across race and income to identify 'nonnegotiables' and values, noting staff at smaller campuses already perform multiple duties (library aide/crossing guard/tier 3 instruction). Lehi Principal Eileen McFarland reported parents and teachers were surprised by school expense breakdowns in the budgeting exercise; families asked for clearer definitions of roles so they could understand the impacts of potential position reductions.
District presenters emphasized two coordination needs: (1) similar timing across regionally linked schools so one campus is not the only one making cuts that make it appear less attractive, and (2) accounting for shared programs (preschools, gifted programs) that serve multiple schools when measuring costs. Board members asked whether flexible staffing models could be used district-wide without full participatory processes; administrators said smaller schools face sustainability limits and that regional planning or 'learning communities' may better preserve neighborhood schools while offering specialized programming.
The discussion highlighted trade-offs between neighborhood access and program opportunity, and board members asked staff to explore regional stakeholder groups and school-optimization committees for next year.
