Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Service Area Expansion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission votes to transmit two Lutz Lake Fern urban‑service‑area expansion requests despite neighborhood opposition
Summary
The board voted May 8 to transmit two privately initiated Lutz Lake Fern Road urban service area expansion requests (CPA 25‑04 and CPA 25‑03) to state review after extended testimony from Keystone/Odessa residents opposing higher density and citing wetlands, school capacity and water concerns.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Fla. — The Hillsborough County Commission voted May 8 to transmit two privately initiated comprehensive‑plan amendments seeking to expand the urban service area and reclassify roughly 295–308 acres on Lutz Lake Fern Road to higher‑density residential uses, despite extensive opposition from Keystone and Odessa residents and the planning commission’s inconsistency finding.
Planning commission staff told the board the sites contain wetlands, significant wildlife habitat and are largely in the 100‑year flood plain. Public utilities staff warned that existing potable‑water and wastewater distribution capacity may not be sufficient to serve development under the proposed expansions. The Environmental Protection Commission said the sites may present considerable permitting challenges because of wetland extent.
Todd Pressman, agent for property owner Stephen Dibbs, and counsel Jim Porter argued the parcels abut existing suburban cluster development, are proximate to the Veterans Expressway and that the request is appropriate for transmittal — a statutory step to send the proposal to state agencies for review rather than final local approval. "This is a transmittal hearing," Porter said; "you're not making a final decision tonight."
More than a dozen residents and community organizations including the Keystone Civic Association and Terramor Homeowners Association urged denial, contending the changes conflict with the Keystone Odessa Community Plan, would strain schools and roads, and would harm wetlands and the Brooker Creek headwaters.
After discussion about upland versus wetland buildable area, clustering, infrastructure capacity and policy criteria, the board voted to transmit CPA 25‑04 6‑1 (Commissioner Hagan opposed) and CPA 25‑03 5‑2 (Commissioners Cohen and Hagan opposed). A combined resolution to transmit both amendments carried 6‑1.
The transmittal sends the amendments to state agencies for comment; subsequent local decisions will follow state input and any required environmental permitting. Board members emphasized the transmittal does not authorize development; final action will return to the board after agency review.
Key votes: CPA 25‑04 transmitted 6‑1; CPA 25‑03 transmitted 5‑2; combined resolution transmitted 6‑1.
