Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Publication Probate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel approves update to legal‑notice rules, adds online repository and optional electronic creditor filings
Summary
A bill to modernize service‑by‑publication and probate creditor notices — including mandatory print notice, optional online publication if available, and posting to a centralized repository (southcarolinapublicnotices.com) at no charge to personal representatives — received a favorable report after committee debate about protecting older and rural residents.
Get email alerts on the Publication Probate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Bernstein presented H 4511 to modernize how service by publication and probate creditor notices are handled. The bill adds known parties whose addresses cannot be ascertained to the pool eligible for publication service and seeks to harmonize language across code sections to require successive weeks of publication where required.
On publication and probate notice, Bernstein said the committee returned to a balanced approach: require publication in the print edition of a newspaper of general circulation and, where the newspaper maintains an online edition, publish there as well "if available." She said the bill would also require posting notices to a centralized repository — southcarolinapublicnotices.com — maintained by the state’s newspapers and available at no additional charge to the personal representative.
Bernstein told the committee the online repository already exists and is run by a joint venture of South Carolina newspapers; the bill would reference the repository as a no‑cost option for executors and administrators. The measure would also permit electronic creditor filings where a probate court has the technical capacity and allows the court to recover an approved filing fee from the filer.
Members asked whether the personal representative could be held personally liable for failing to publish notice. Bernstein and others clarified that the courts enforce the PR’s duties and that longstanding statutory language provides limited personal‑liability protection to personal representatives in certain circumstances; a committee member asked staff to consider clarifying language.
The committee adopted the subcommittee amendment and then reported H 4511 as amended favorably by roll call (announced tally: 22 in favor, 0 opposed, 3 not voting). Lawmakers said the bill seeks to preserve local print notice while modernizing access to notices for younger or more connected audiences via online posting.
