Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Udo Amendment Accessory Structures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves UDO amendment to align accessory-structure rules with building code
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 6–0 to pass UDO Amendment No. 78 clarifying accessory building and structure definitions, reducing required separation from 10 feet to 5 feet to match building-code fire protections, and adding a 25-foot height cap (with exceptions).
The Independence Planning Commission unanimously adopted UDO Amendment No. 78 on Jan. 27 to clarify rules for accessory buildings and structures.
Staff told commissioners the amendment (case 26175-01) updates inconsistent language in the Unified Development Ordinance, adds definitions for public and semi-private recreational facilities and pool types, and aligns accessory-structure separation with the building code. Specifically, the amendment reduces separation between accessory buildings from 10 feet to 5 feet to match the fire-protection standard in the building code. Staff said, “the building code actually for fire protection has it as 5 feet, so we wanted to be consistent with that.” The update also limits accessory structure height to 25 feet, with existing code sections (for example in business parks) taking precedence where they differ.
Commissioners discussed how the change should reduce the number of variances sent to the Board of Adjustment for older, smaller lots where a 10-foot separation often triggered special approvals. No members of the public spoke for or against the amendment. A motion to approve the amendment passed 6–0.
The amendment clarifies fence and pool terminology and is intended to eliminate inconsistent application of older code language. The commission directed staff to proceed with the recorded adoption steps required for the UDO change.
