Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the University Impacts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board agrees to sign multi‑party MOU for Penn State consultant; township share estimated ≤ $6,000

Harris Township Board of Supervisors · March 12, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board agreed to sign a county‑prepared MOU so a consultant can assess Penn State University’s municipal impacts; the consultant’s total cost was not expected to exceed $30,000 and the township’s share was estimated at no more than $6,000, with final distribution to be negotiated by the partner municipalities.

The board discussed a proposed consultant engagement to assess the municipal impacts of Penn State University and to inform negotiations over payments‑in‑lieu‑of‑taxes. Staff said the consultant estimated the work would not exceed $30,000 in total; because five parties participate in the settlement group, the township’s share should be no higher than $6,000.

Some supervisors suggested alternative allocation methods (for example, prorating based on an agreed metric), but staff said the county had already circulated a memorandum of understanding (MOU) and that all other partners had signed. Staff urged signing so the consultant could begin work quickly; board members emphasized that any final distribution of revenue from a renewed agreement would return to the board for approval.

One supervisor asked where the township currently records the existing Penn State payment; staff identified roughly $13,000 per year as the township’s present receipt and suggested it appeared in revenues under a general category. Board members asked that the consultant analysis consider traffic and service impacts (CATA, event traffic) and noted that allocation of any increase among partners will be negotiated but ultimately returned to each governing board for approval.

A motion to sign the MOU and move forward with consultant selection was supported by several supervisors; the board signaled approval and staff prepared to sign the county’s MOU to begin consultant work.