Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears details of FY26 budget amendment; staff flags small reserve dip

Takoma Park City Council · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Director Chung presented FY26 Budget Amendment No. 3, outlining a $54,097 net general-fund increase (police court expenses, library overtime, facility maintenance), a $400,000 projected red light camera revenue increase, and staff said the unassigned reserve ratio could fall to about 16.7% but that year-end activity will determine actual reserves.

Director Chung presented the city’s proposed third amendment to the FY26 budget, explaining department-level adjustments and fund-specific changes.

Chung said the general fund shows a net budget increase of $54,097 with key items including $29,500 for police court expenses and $12,000 for library overtime and supplemental assistance. Within Housing and Community Development, a $20,000 increase for a partnership program is fully offset by capital reductions to Maple Avenue connectivity and New Hampshire Avenue bikeway projects. Facility maintenance increased by $12,597 for a rec-center divider curtain.

For the Red Light Camera Fund, staff projected a $400,000 revenue increase tied to a stoplight camera pilot program and a $19,580 expenditure increase associated with the police promotional process; Chung reported a net revenue change tied to that fund in the cover memo. Special Revenue Funds appropriate $18,900 in carry-forward library construction funds.

Chung told council the estimated unassigned reserve ratio would fall to about 16.7% from a 17% planning target but emphasized these are budgeted estimates and actual year-end results (June 30, 2026) will determine final balances. Council members asked for clarifications on the promotional-process cost and whether that expense was a transfer or a newly identified item; police leadership said the promotional assessment is a biennial, contracted process for promotion to corporal, sergeant and lieutenant and had been inadvertently left off the adopted budget.

The council did not vote on the amendment tonight; staff said the item will return to a voting session on a subsequent agenda for a formal vote.