Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Setback Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning administrator approves Colfax-side setback variance for Jonas Maciel Domenici

Placer County Zoning Administrator and Parcel Review Committee · January 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Placer County approved a variance allowing construction of a 3,116 sq. ft. dwelling 10 feet from the south property line (30 ft normally required) for a steep, irregularly shaped Colfax parcel (Poppy Way). Staff cited emergency-access and topography constraints; the appeal period was waived because no public comment was received.

The Placer County Zoning Administrator approved a side-setback variance for the Jonas Maciel Domenici property (PLN25-00394) in unincorporated Colfax, allowing construction of a 3,116-square-foot single-family dwelling 10 feet from the south property line where a 30-foot setback normally applies.

Staff reported the 6.21-acre parcel off Poppy Way is irregularly shaped, steeply sloped and heavily vegetated, with limited buildable area and necessary emergency-vehicle access constraints. The county consulted Placer Hills Fire about driveway geometry; staff said the driveway width could not be reduced and that the site’s physical attributes supported variance findings. An errata to condition of approval number 3 (encroachment onto private road Poppy Way) was read into the record.

Owner-applicant Jessica Jonas Maciel testified that the home design process took three years, that living space is about 1,500 sq. ft. (paper lists larger numbers due to eaves and passive-solar features), and that a neighboring offer of land would not enable a boundary-line adjustment. Jacobson determined the project exempt under CEQA and approved the variance based on staff findings and the errata; because there were no public commenters on the item, she waived the appeal period so only the applicant retains appeal rights.