Geary County commenters urge review, possible opposition to state water bill headed to Senate
Loading...
Summary
At a Geary County meeting, public commenters urged the commission to review a recently passed House bill now before the Kansas Senate, expressing concern it would shift control over water transmission away from counties; testimony for the Senate hearing is due by Wednesday.
Public commenters at a Geary County meeting urged county officials to review and consider opposing a state bill that attendees said would formalize state control over water transmission.
Unidentified Speaker 2, who provided written materials to the commission, told members the measure has already passed the Kansas House and is scheduled for a Senate hearing Thursday. "The testimony has to be submitted by Wednesday morning," the speaker said. Speaker 3 said the House vote passed roughly "116 to 6."
Commenters repeatedly warned the bill could disadvantage local governments and favor one party in ongoing litigation. "It doesn't make sense to me at all," said Unidentified Speaker 2, describing concern that the proposal would "take county authority on the transmission of water." Speakers noted the matter is already the subject of court attention in Kansas.
Speakers described practical differences across jurisdictions, saying some areas rely on rural water districts while others depend on private wells. Unidentified Speaker 3, speaking from a farmer's perspective, said farmers must "fill out for our water rights" annually and are metered; commenters discussed limits expressed in acre-feet and river-mile measures but those figures were described conversationally and not presented as definitive policy citations.
Commission members and commenters discussed next steps. Unidentified Speaker 1 said they had contacted Representative Johnson and planned to check county-association resources; speakers suggested county counsel review the bill. Several commenters said it may be too late to place formal county opposition on the commission agenda before the Senate hearing and encouraged residents to submit individual testimony if they wish to weigh in.
The commission did not take formal action on the bill during the meeting. The procedural deadline raised in public comment is testimony due by Wednesday for a Senate hearing scheduled Thursday.
