Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cfds Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Murrieta approves multiple CFD annexations and creates new public safety and Rustic Meadows CFDs
Summary
The council approved annexations and new community facilities districts July 15: annexations to CFD 2025‑2 (maintenance) for Rustic Meadows and Kensington Apartments, formation of CFD 2025‑s for public safety services, and CFD 2025‑4 Rustic Meadows with bond authority up to $5 million; all measures passed unanimously after clerk-reported property owner elections.
Get email alerts on the Cfds Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Murrieta City Council on July 15 approved a package of community facilities district (CFD) annexations and formations intended to fund maintenance and public‑safety services for new residential developments.
Finance Director Javier Carcamo and staff presented a combined report covering four CFD actions and two annexations. Staff said Rustic Meadows (located near Whitewood Road and Clinton Keith, east of I‑215) is roughly 10 gross acres with about 153 single‑family units; the proposed maintenance CFD would levy $332 per unit (with an annual escalator of CPI or 2%, whichever is higher) and has an estimated assessment revenue of about $770,796. Kensington Apartments (southeast corner of Washington Avenue and Magnolia) is roughly 4.7 acres with about 126 multifamily units and a proposed maintenance special tax of $98 per unit. The presentation also described formation of a new public safety CFD (CFD 2025‑s) that would levy $580 per unit for single‑family, $468 per unit for multifamily and $150 per unit for affordable housing, each with a 4% annual escalator; staff said these levies apply only to new development that annexes into the district and would not affect existing residents unless they purchase into the new developments.
Carcamo noted the Rustic Meadows CFD would allow bond indebtedness up to $5,000,000 to cover public facility construction and school mitigation fees (he estimated roughly $3.1 million of school and city mitigation fees may be paid from bond proceeds). For the annexations and CFD formations, the city clerk reported property owner ballots cast at the hearing were approved by more than two‑thirds; the council adopted the required resolutions, certified election results and introduced associated ordinances. Motions on each item carried unanimously 5–0.
Council members questioned escalator formulas and effective tax rates. Council member Holliday confirmed the maintenance CFD escalator is CPI or 2% (no cap) and that the public safety CFD uses a flat 4% escalator. Holliday and others said the effective developer tax rates presented (for one project 1.58%) were lower than some past comparisons, which staff confirmed.
The council’s actions set the CFD formations and annexations in motion; staff said selected ordinance second readings and final actions will return to council (staff noted second readings may occur at the Aug. 19 meeting).

