Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Council adds splash pad to 6+ year CIP list after debate over cost and feasibility

Town of Oak Ridge Town Council · February 20, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted to add a splash pad to the Town of Oak Ridge CIP in the 6+ years column and directed Parks & Rec to explore options and estimates after members debated costs, parking and water infrastructure.

The Town of Oak Ridge council voted to add a splash pad (identified for Heritage Farm Park) to the capital improvement plan’s 6+ years list and instructed Parks & Recreation to explore options and prepare cost estimates. The motion included a note that the item would be considered an exploratory entry, not a funded immediate project.

Discussion centered on whether the splash pad remains desired by residents — Speaker 1 cited survey results showing strong community interest — and whether the town currently has the water infrastructure required. Estimates mentioned in the discussion ranged from a prior quoted $120,000 to a more current $150,000–$250,000 range; Speaker 1 stated that a recirculation system estimate was roughly $200,000 and that no sewer hook-up would be required because there is a nearby water hookup and filtration system.

Opponents raised maintenance, parking and staffing concerns and noted the splash pad is not included in the current master plan. One council member said, "People come when there's a splash pad. It's like a magnet," while another said constraints — including parking and master-plan alignment — make the project unrealistic at present.

Outcome: the council approved placing the splash pad on the CIP at 6+ years with an instruction to Parks & Rec to "explore options" and to return next year with more complete data and budget estimates. The motion was seconded and carried by a voice vote; the transcript records both ayes and opposition but does not include a full roll-call tally.