Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Martinsville redevelopment members debate whether RDC or city should hold properties while FEMA review is pending
Summary
Committee members discussed whether the Redevelopment Commission should retain several properties or deed them to the city, including a parking lot on Main and Wayne and a house on Southview Drive tied to a proposed park under FEMA review; members cited flexibility of RDC-held proceeds versus city appraisal and bidding constraints.
Members of the Martinsville City Redevelopment Committee discussed the disposition of several properties and a pending FEMA review for a proposed park built around a house on Southview Drive during a session focused on property strategy and development updates.
Staff member Joe said he had been working with Dale Coffee on whether the RDC should hold certain properties while the city establishes rules, noting that RDC ownership is allowed provided the RDC does not use properties as income-producing rentals. He questioned whether it made sense to pay winterization costs for the Southview Drive house if the RDC will not retain it for rental use.
The Mayor urged a cautious approach to changing property status while the FEMA review remains unresolved, saying the park proposal had been sent to FEMA before the prior federal shutdown and the approval process remained in limbo. The Mayor said the plan envisions using the existing Southview Drive house as restrooms and an office for the park, and emphasized avoiding changes that might jeopardize FEMA approval.
Members also discussed deeding the parking lot at Main and Wayne and possible zoning changes for six lots on South Ohio Street. Participants said RDC ownership can offer more flexibility for reinvesting proceeds from sales than immediate transfer to the general fund would permit, but cautioned that both RDC and the city must follow appraisal and bidding rules when selling real property.
Committee members asked staff to negotiate with city officials and proceed in a way that preserves planned development options and minimizes the risk that procurement technicalities will derail deals.
