Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Disposition topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews revised disposition policy; attorney says RFP/one-year notice required before private sales

Hubbard County HRA/EDA Board · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board discussed attorney guidance on the agency's disposition-of-property policy: statutory one-year notification and required advertising/RFP for development, with a private negotiated sale permitted only after marketing/no responses; board scheduled a special meeting to review RFP responses.

The Hubbard HRA/EDA reviewed changes to its disposition-of-property policy after tabling the item last month. Speaker 4 told the board the agency's attorney advised the board it must follow the statute's one-year notice requirement and pursue development through advertising or an RFP before accepting private offers. "It's very clear in statute that that is what we must do," Speaker 4 said when summarizing the attorney's response.

The attorney provided sample language and a process that allows a "private negotiated sale after marketing the property," Speaker 4 said. Under that approach the agency can bulk-advertise multiple lots online, invite responses, and then negotiate with interested parties without hiring a realtor for each parcel while still meeting public-hearing and notice requirements.

The board discussed how that process would apply to a potential industrial park and specific lots (including one in Nevis). Members raised infrastructure questions: Speaker 4 said extending the existing dead-end road and adding a turnaround for snow-plow and truck access could cost roughly $125,000, and that access costs affect lot value and terms of sale.

Board members also discussed timeline and competitive-bid periods. The RFP had been posted with an 18-day response window; one member asked for a 30-day window in future solicitations. To satisfy notice requirements for a public hearing tied to RFP review, the board set a brief special meeting to consider proposals and set a conditional public hearing (special meeting: March 3 at 11:00; public hearing: March 17 if a tentative developer is selected). The board approved scheduling the special meeting by voice vote.