Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Common Level Ratio topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident presses Warren County over common level ratio change; county staff explains reassessment process
Summary
During public comment an attendee raised concerns that the county's common level ratio (CLR) had been redlined from 13.89% to 100% and asked whether commissioners authorized the change; county staff explained that CLR becomes 1.00 once a reassessment is effective and agreed to follow up with documentation.
A resident questioned Warren County commissioners during public comment about what they described as a change to the county's common level ratio (CLR) used in property tax appeals, saying a previously certified 13.89% entry had been crossed out and replaced by 100% (administrative/1.00).
"They said the commissioners," the attendee (Speaker 6) said, recounting a conversation with the state tax equalization board and asking whether county officials had transmitted data that changed the CLR. The speaker asked why the 13.89% was not used in early appeals and whether county actions prompted the redline.
County staff (Speaker 9) answered with a procedural explanation of reassessments and the CLR: "Once the reassessment becomes effective, that number goes to 1 because the values that were generated through the reassessment are presumed legislatively and through the process to be fair market value at the time," Speaker 9 said. Staff offered to provide the historic CLR data and to review any documentation the resident could supply.
Other attendees and commenters echoed confusion over the state charts and certification dates; one speaker said the 13.89 figure had been shown on an earlier chart and later redlined. County officials said assessment office procedures and reassessment timing drive CLR adjustments and that the solicitor would work with residents to clarify the issue and provide documentation.
The commissioners asked the county solicitor to follow up with the residents to provide records and explanations. No formal action was taken at the meeting; the exchange concluded with an agreement to pursue documentation and additional explanation outside the meeting.
Context: The CLR is a percentage factor historically used to estimate fair market value relative to assessed values for appeals; the county and state assessment offices described different chart views and cited the timing of reassessments as the technical cause of a CLR moving to 1.00 in reassessment years.
