Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Advance Voting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hearing on changes to advance voting and registration deadlines sparks access and technical concerns
Summary
House Bill 24-53 would shift voter-registration and advance-voting dates (adding days at the front end of mailing and extending application lead time). Proponents said the changes would improve mail timing and processing; opponents and clerks warned the registration shift and Sunday/Monday scheduling raise access and statutory issues.
The Committee on Elections heard testimony on House Bill 24-53, a proposal to adjust the timing of advance voting, ballot mailing and voter registration in order to give election officials more time to process and voters more time to receive and return mail ballots.
Proponent Representative Sandy Pickert (District 88) described the bill as adding days to the front end of the election calendar: advance voting would begin earlier so ballots could be mailed on Monday rather than Wednesday, the advance-voting period would increase from 20 to 22 days, the voter-registration cutoff would move to 23 days before the election, and applications for advance ballots by mail would need to be submitted 14 days before the election rather than seven. Pickert said those changes were intended to address slow mail and give election offices sufficient processing time.
Neutral adviser Clay Barker told the committee the legislature has wide authority to change timelines but noted trade-offs: the measure preserves a short cycle for many jurisdictions but would eliminate some late-request options and could compel weekend work in counties that currently rely on Monday morning operations. Harvey County Clerk Rick Pfeiffer echoed technical concerns, saying the bill’s language could force counties to open on Sunday and that current statute may not allow Sunday operations.
Melissa Steiler, advocacy director at Loudlight Civic Action, opposed the bill saying the registration deadline shift would disenfranchise young, mobile and first-time voters and that other states manage longer mail-ballot lead times without moving registration cutoffs. She argued the bill imposes two weeks of restrictions in the month before an election and urged more creative government responses to postal delays.
Committee members asked about the fiscal note and implementation: officials said most of the change is a re-sequencing of dates, that the 14-day mail application deadline could exclude about 5% of current applicants who apply in the 14-to-7-day window, and that voter-education would be necessary during any transition. Lawmakers closed the hearing without a committee vote that day.
