Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

After SB 1573 fails at state level, Clackamas commissioner asks staff to study local buffer ordinance around syringe service programs

Board of County Commissioners, Clackamas County · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioner West asked the board to direct staff to study a local ordinance creating buffer zones between syringe service programs (SSPs) and schools/daycares after the bipartisan state bill (SB 1573) failed; he urged outreach to cities and the Association of Oregon Counties.

Commissioner West used the communications portion of the Feb. 17 meeting to urge the board to explore local policy options following the failure of Senate Bill 1573 at the Oregon Legislature. West described SB 1573 as bipartisan and said the county submitted a nuanced letter of opposition during the session. He asked staff and county counsel to research what Clackamas County could do locally — including whether an ordinance could establish a 1,000–2,000 foot buffer between syringe service programs and school‑aged children or daycares — and to coordinate with cities and the Association of Oregon Counties if the county pursues a regional approach.

"So what can we do at the local level to maybe bring that common sense pragmatic policy to Clackamas County," West said during his remarks, adding that he wants staff to return with options on buffer distances and enforcement teeth that balance behavioral‑health needs and child safety. Commissioners expressed general interest in having staff look into the issue; West said he has already talked to county counsel and asked the board to support directing staff to draft an ordinance and to engage city partners.

No formal vote or ordinance was proposed at the meeting. The board did not take immediate action beyond West’s request to staff to explore ordinance options and coordinate with partners; if the board directs staff in a future agenda the matter would return for formal consideration.