Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities Water Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hutchinson water department reports 117 million gallons saved, plans continued leak detection

Hutchinson City Council · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The city's utilities director reported a roughly 4% year-over-year reduction in treated water loss — about 117 million gallons — yielding roughly $166,140 in plant cost savings and an estimated $591,265 in recoverable revenue; staff will continue meter replacements and three-year leak-detection work.

HUTCHINSON, Kan. — City utilities staff told the Hutchinson City Council on Feb. 17 that changes in field operations and an outside leak-detection effort reduced treated water losses by roughly 4%, an improvement staff quantified at about 117,000,000 gallons.

David Gwen, the city’s director of utilities, said the reduction reflects targeted work on hydrants, valves and leaks and the hiring of a leak-detection contractor. "So totals for 2025: main breaks, 51; service leaks, 80; hydrants replaced, 58; hydrant repairs, 49; valves replaced, 39," Gwen said, urging the council to recognize crew efforts. He told the council the water-loss decrease translated to an approximate plant cost savings of $166,140 and future-sale revenue potential of about $591,265 based on the city’s lowest-tier rate.

Gwen said some meter replacements and the rollout of automatic meter infrastructure (AMI) will help capture additional savings and that leak-detection work is planned on a three-year cadence. He described the current non-revenue water rate at roughly 18.7% and said his long-term goal is closer to 12%.

Council members praised operations and leadership and asked about additional technology and monitoring; Gwen said pressure-monitoring and AMI are options but are costly and not the immediate priority while crews continue hydrant and valve work.