Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Telehealth Licensure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears support for telehealth licensure fix, technical updates in HB 4,070

House Committee on Behavioral Health · February 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 4,070 drew broad support Feb. 5 for technical statutory updates affecting crisis stabilization, telehealth licensure and supervision; providers and county officials backed dash-1 and dash-4 amendments clarifying telehealth licensure and crisis stabilization staffing.

The House Behavioral Health Committee opened a public hearing on House Bill 4,070 on Feb. 5, receiving broad support for a package of technical corrections and telehealth clarifications.

Committee staff described HB 4,070 as a committee bill that modernizes statutory terminology, clarifies responsibility for emergency psychiatric care by community programs, reduces administrative burden for behavioral-health providers, and includes several amendment packages (dash-1 through dash-5) that address discrete issues including crisis stabilization centers, telehealth credentialing, and nurse-to-patient ratio delays.

Multiple state and local health partners told the committee the dash-1 and dash-4 amendments correct long-standing drafting issues. Cheryl Ramirez of the Association of Oregon Community Mental Health Programs and Heather Jeffress of the Oregon Council for Behavioral Health said the changes align statute with current system practice and will help stalled rulemaking proceed. Ann Ford (EOCCO) described dash-4 as a necessary clarification to prevent out-of-state, unlicensed providers from delivering behavioral-health telehealth services to Oregonians: "This simply clarifies that if you're providing behavioral health telehealth services to Oregonians, you must be licensed in Oregon," she said.

NAMI Oregon and county public-health officials also voiced support, noting the dash-4 amendment does not remove telehealth flexibility for properly licensed providers but protects patient safety and oversight. Witnesses asked the committee to consider broader long-term steps to formalize and regulate certain unlicensed or certificate-of-approval workforces, but emphasized the present amendments are an important, near-term fix.

The committee closed the hearing on HB 4,070 and adjourned for the day. The measure and associated amendments will proceed through committee processes.