Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs change to curb litigation abuse in family law (HB 555) after emotional testimony
Summary
After multiple public testimonies about repeated and costly post-divorce litigation, the committee adopted an amendment and favorably recommended HB 555, which strengthens judges’ authority on attorney-fee awards to curb frivolous or harassing filings while preserving due process.
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Tracy Miller presented HB 555 on Feb. 23, describing the bill as a targeted response to "litigation abuse"—repeated or frivolous family-court filings that can financially and emotionally drain victims. The bill revises how courts handle attorney fees and costs in family law cases, adds the word "modify" to existing establish/modify language, and requires a specific judicial finding if fees are not awarded.
Multiple public commenters described long-running, costly court battles. Catherine Hutton, speaking in person, detailed dozens of filings across court systems that she said depleted her business and finances; she said, "If this bill was law during the course of my litigations... it probably would have prevented most of it." Emily Martin Prisbury of the Utah Single Mothers Coalition described additional cases of single mothers facing steep legal costs to preserve protective orders. Online commenters raised concerns about escalation and whether fee awards could be weaponized.
Representative Acton moved House Amendment 1 to restore the word "substantially" in a key line; the committee adopted the amendment unanimously. Committee chair Lisonbee moved to favorably recommend the bill with the caveat that the sponsor work with members to refine language and ensure balance; Representative Miller agreed. The committee favorably recommended HB 555 as amended by voice vote.
Committee members emphasized the need to balance protection for abuse victims and access to courts for legitimate claims; the sponsor and public commenters urged careful drafting and further stakeholder work before floor action.
