Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Association Of Oregon Counties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate adopts resolution honoring Association of Oregon Counties on 120th anniversary
Summary
The Oregon Senate unanimously adopted SCR 204 recognizing the Association of Oregon Counties' 120th anniversary and praised counties’ role delivering local services; senators emphasized strains from unfunded mandates during the debate.
Get email alerts on the Association Of Oregon Counties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Oregon State Senate on the floor adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 204, commemorating the 120th anniversary of the Association of Oregon Counties and recognizing the role counties play delivering local services across the state.
Senator Solman introduced the resolution, calling attention to the range of services counties provide — from emergency medical services and courts to public health and transportation — and urged colleagues to support the measure. "Counties deliver community corrections and operate district attorney offices, sheriff's departments, jails, search and rescue teams, juvenile services, emergency medical services, 9-1-1 systems, and emergency management," Solman said.
Several senators added remarks about the partnership between the legislature and county governments and the fiscal pressures counties face. Senator Jeff Golden, drawing on his experience in county government, warned that unfunded mandates can place severe financial strain on counties and urged lawmakers to consider county impacts when drafting future legislation. Senator Nash, closing remarks for the proponents, reflected on the long history of counties in Oregon and the role commissioners play in representing local communities.
The resolution was put to a recorded vote and was declared adopted with a constitutional majority. The adoption occasioned brief reminders from the presiding officer about chamber decorum during the reception that preceded the vote.
The resolution is ceremonial and does not change law or direct action; supporters said it is intended to acknowledge county service and strengthen intergovernmental relationships.
